The first Kindle was a far cry from the company’s modern Paperwhite reader: The original clocked in at 10.3 ounces (for reference, the 2019 model comes in at 6.1 ounces). However, our reviewers commented on how light it still feels to them, with Peter1110 calling it “easy to hold” and Kevin stating “10 ounces is heavy, until you realize that the average paperback book is 15 ounces (and hardbacks can be significantly more).”
“kindle_largefont” by Drathus is licensed under CC BY-SA 2.0
We heard of a conflicting experience when it came to the Kindle’s lithium polymer battery. While Tomtom11 said they’d had great experiences with the battery life on the first-generation e-reader, they also reported a minor problem. “I let the battery completely drain one time and had to remove the battery and use the reset button to get it going again. Directions on the Kindle support site took me through the process.”
Lots of users wanted to talk about the advantages of the 6-inch, 800 x 600 screen on the original device. TimothyMcGrath called it “very easy on the eyes, just like looking at paper,” while Peter1110 noted that “the screen is purposefully designed so that you can read while the sun is glaring.”
Kevin said the screen “was good, except that you still needed a light source to read by.” And Tomtom11 pointed out that “as with other ebook readers, there is no backlight, so reading in bed still requires a good lamp (or a clip-on book lamp).” This feedback was something Amazon eventually took to heart when it debuted the 2012 Kindle Paperwhite, which ran on four built-in LEDs.
Buttons and controls
Another aspect of the Kindle that readers were eager to discuss was its keyboard and controls. In 2007, the same year the first iPhone was released, touchscreens were not yet standard. As a result of that, perhaps, the first-generation Kindle suffered from trying to cram in a full set of buttons and controls alongside the screen. Kevin said “the keyboard was made for using thumbs, but I found that to be really clunky and would just lay it down and type two-fingered.” TimothyMcGrath said that in retrospect the “controls for the Kindle are usable but after using the Kindle 2, they definitely feel inferior. It uses a sliding wheel to select items which can be difficult especially for older people.”
That irritation extended to the e-reader’s controls as well. Kevin stated the “page controls weren’t the greatest,” and that the “separate position indication was a nice touch, but it was pretty useless.” BrianCarnell agreed, saying “annotation is also an important feature to me, but I found the keyboard all but useless.” But Tomtom11 felt differently, finding that “page turns are quick and although I’m a lefty, the configurations for the buttons for turning pages are still pretty convenient.” And Peter1110 said that users “can easily move the directional keys to highlight important sentences or phrases.”
“IMG_6137.JPG” by mak506 is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 2.0
One thing that all our reviewers could agree upon was the importance of the Kindle’s book selection and its ability to connect to Whispernet via 3G. TimothyMcGrath thought it was “great to be able to download books without hooking up to a PC.” Ttringle said that “sampling new books cost me quite a bit of money, when Amazon makes it so easy to buy new books over the 3G.” Tomtom11 was effusive in their praise: “I absolutely love the Whispernet connectivity; no need for a computer and it allows you to download books anywhere, anytime.” And Ogre felt the “internet connectivity is what makes it so great, no other e-reader (at this time) can connect directly to the book source.” They added: “I read way more than before because I am fairly lazy and would put off going to the store to get books. I need new books now! This is what makes the Kindle better than any other reader.”
Peter1110, who felt that the “Kindle takes advantage of the enormous selection of books in the Amazon bookstore, many of which are free,” also felt that the “Kindle does not replace textbooks for college. I was initially very thrilled when I bought the Kindle version of the textbook for my biology class, however, the lack of color in the Kindle makes it hard to clearly interpret diagrams that are colored for the purpose of distinguishing between certain anatomies of the body.” (A later version of the Kindle, the DX, was better suited for textbook reading.)
BrianCarnell said that while “buying ebooks from Amazon is the main feature the Kindle has that other e-readers don’t, from my experience Amazon’s DRM scheme is pernicious and using the wireless network drained the battery ridiculously quickly, even when the device wasn’t in use.” TimothyMcGrath pointed out another drawback, stating that “books are excellent on the Kindle, but I have given up on magazines and newspapers. The format just doesn’t work for them. Amazon really needs to make it more like reading a magazine or newspaper in real life or on the web.”
“Kindle” by FourOhFour is licensed under CC BY-NC 2.0
Having now gone through dozens of upgrades and improvements, the current Kindle is a far cry from the original model. BrianCarnell, who reviewed the Kindle in 2009, said he “read a few books on it and then passed it along to a coworker in favor of a Sony Reader with a touchscreen.” TimothyMcGrath, who also wrote his review in 2009, said “I highly recommend the Kindle, but if you’re planning on buying one, definitely pick up the newer version. It is much improved over this great, original device.” Kevin said “I currently use the Fire but the page controls aren’t the greatest. I actually think the Fire tablet is worse than the original Kindle because the action depends on where and how you press, it’s difficult to be consistent even after more than a year of using it.”
That said, a few users took time to point out the disadvantages of the device; BrianCarnell said that “it’s not that the Kindle is a poor device, it’s just that it is so bland there’s not much to get excited about.” However most were effusive in their praise for the gadget; both ttringle and TimothyMcGrath said they loved their first-generation Kindles, with ttringle adding “the Kindle is one of the best things a reader can do for themselves, book lovers shouldnt be without one.” Tomtom11 felt the Kindle “is a great ebook reader; overall, I highly recommend it.” Finally, Ogre, who was skeptical that the device would actually replace books for them, said “I often get tired of gadgets before too long. I’ve had my Kindle since November of 2007 and I still use it every single day.”
Go to Source
Author: Team E-crypto News
Believe it or not, Bitcoin is only 53% below its all-time high near $20,000. Ethereum, on the other hand, hasn’t fared so well. The second-largest cryptocurrency, despite the recent rally in the cryptocurrency markets, is still down by over 80% from its all-time high above $1,400, which it reached during the mania of the previous bull market.In spite of this harrowing price trend, analysts are starting to become convinced that ETH is ready to surge higher.Ethereum Preparing To Burst Higher: Here’s WhyJosh Olszewicz, a crypto asset analyst at markets research firm and data provider Brave New Coin, recently gave a confluence of technical analysis factors as to why the price of Ethereum could soon surge by hundreds of percent:ETH is currently in the midst of forming an Adam & Eve bottom on its weekly chart. Should the bottom play out in full, the price could reach $444 to $555, Olszewicz suggests, noting that is where there exists a confluence of the 1.618 Fibonacci Retracement and the measured move, which are both nearly “yearly pivots.”The volume profile purportedly agrees with this sentiment, with the analyst adding that a pitchfork he drew on the chart of Ethereum suggests a move to the aforementioned level by late July or late September.Ethereum is showing the potential to embark on an end-to-end Ichimoku Cloud move from $200 to $750, which is a move that Bitcoin did from 2015 to 2017.1W $ETHstill very early, but possibility of A&E-type pattern building1.618 and measured move are also near yearly pivots, $444-$555 pic.twitter.com/OZSFBxyc87— Josh Olszewicz (@CarpeNoctom) January 30, 2020
The Brave New Coin analyst isn’t the only market commentator to have suggested that Ethereum could soon rally towards $800.Per previous reports from this very outlet, leading cryptocurrency trader CryptoWolf shared a TradingView analysis in which he stated that the largest altcoin could soon return to levels it hasn’t seen since early-2018.He noted that he believes ETH has just exited the recent bear market, having broken above key resistance levels, a bearish price channel, and a falling wedge that has constrained price action for months on end. He added that once the cryptocurrency manages to surmount the $175 to $190 range, which are levels of historical importance, the cryptocurrency will likely be clear for a long-term surge towards $800 — over 300% above current prices.Dependent On BitcoinEthereum’s price action should be dependent on Bitcoin, despite the abovementioned technicals.But fortunately for ETH bulls, the technicals purportedly favor BTC bulls too. SmartContracter, the trader who called Bitcoin’s $3,200 bottom in June 2018, said that BTC is currently forming a five-wave rise from the $6,000s, thus “breaking [a] key downtrend.” He added that considering the rally from the 2018 bottom at $3,150 — which he called — was also five waves, he expects for this bull run to continue into 2020.Featured Image from Shutterstock
Go to Source
Author: Nick Chong
Last December Brian Behlendorf is the Executive Director of Hyperledger said that 2019 was a year of “careful, prosaic BUIDLING.” Now, in an interview with CoinDesk’s Michael Casey at Davos, Behlendorf said he believes a lot of what the blockchain ecosystem was building is getting closer to becoming a net positive in the world.
Citing “double-digit” blockchain usage in the diamond trade for tracing provenance, a variety of blockchain-based digital identity projects, and the rise of central bank-backed digital currency, Behlendorf painted an upbeat picture of a technology moving quietly from concept phase to “in-production” deployment.
“At this point, there have been enough pilots. There’s a path here through this technology to production employment,” he said.
By using tools like digital identity and secure transactions, Behlendorf believes many of the biggest problems of the day can, in some ways, be improved.
“We’re moving towards much more self-managed, self-sovereign distributed digital identity, which would not have been possible without distributed ledger technology. I know that’s a big recurring theme here that we’re hearing, and now you’re seeing legitimization in the form of the central bank’s recognizing the technology inside. So I’m feeling a tipping point,” he said.
The annual event in Davos, he said, is the right place to get government and business leaders to engage on such projects.
“I worked for the World Economic Forum for two years as chief technology officer so I’ve been coming here for quite a while,” he said. “The forum itself was founded on these idealistic notions making the world better.”
The goal, said Behlendorf, was to build consensus around pressing issues. He sees parallels to this mission in the blockchain.
“[You get] people in a room around a table from all sorts of different sides of an issue, get them to talk about how you get out of a thorny systemic problem and come out of that room with a consensus view of how to fix things, right?” he said. “That’s kind of blockchain in a nutshell.”
Disclosure Read More
The leader in blockchain news, CoinDesk is a media outlet that strives for the highest journalistic standards and abides by a strict set of editorial policies. CoinDesk is an independent operating subsidiary of Digital Currency Group, which invests in cryptocurrencies and blockchain startups.
Go to Source
Author: John Biggs
Most of us have a few devices that need regular charging, and a decent 2-port or, at the most, 5-port charger is enough. But some people have to charge up more devices than that. A lot more. And daisy-chaining a bunch of standard chargers on an extension cord is not really a long-term workable solution.
But there is an answer.
Must read: The ultimate MacBook USB-C accessory just got better
As usual, which solution you choose depends on how much you want to spend.
At the cheaper end of the spectrum, there are plenty of USB hubs out there that come equipped with a variety of ports. At the smaller, more reserved, end of the spectrum, there are plenty of 7-port, 10-port, and 16-port USB hubs available.
I’ve tested these, and while they work well, they’re more of a consumer item as opposed to something that you might have working daily in a workplace or office. These also handle data transfer, so they aren’t dedicated charge stations.
Prices range from about $38 to $80.
Need more? Sure thing.
Here are a pair of decent USB charge hubs with 20-ports and 25-ports. Priced around $35, these are more suited to daily use, and handle higher power load better thanks to more efficient cooling. These are dedicated charging hubs, so don’t carry data between devices.
Prices are around $40.
Need more ports? Not a problem.
While not many are going to want such charging capacities, 60-port and even monster 100-port USB charging hubs exist, priced in the $100 to $160 region. They are big and bulky, and will need a fair bit of space (factor in having tens of devices connected, along with all the wiring), and are not the sort of thing you’re going to want to move about regularly.
While on the subject of wiring, you’ll need a lot of USB cables. I recommend decent braided cables to eliminate snagging, and the whole project turning into spaghetti. Cables from the Amazon Basics or Anker Powerline line work well because they resist tangling.
While you might find cheaper units around, I would not trust their ability to deliver this sort of power. You’re dealing with a lot of power, and also connecting a lot of devices to a single charge point.
Simultaneously blowing up a hundred smartphones doesn’t bear thinking about.
Go to Source
Author: Team E-crypto News
Andrew Yang, who is running for U.S. president in the 2020 election, has explained what his priorities will be regarding cryptocurrency under his administration. He said that crypto investors are finding a way to make use of their investments and regulations cannot impede it. Yang advocates for a uniform, nationwide set of crypto regulations so the U.S. is not stuck with state-by-state policies.
Yang’s Crypto Priorities
Andrew Yang is an entrepreneur who is running for U.S. president as a Democrat in 2020. In an interview with Bloomberg’s Joe Weisenthal in Iowa on Wednesday, Yang was asked about his policies in a number of areas, including cryptocurrency, universal basic income (UBI), and the coronavirus.
“There is a lot of people who are like really big cryptocurrency fans … they love Andrew Yang,” Weisenthal began. He asked the presidential candidate what he would do under his administration with regard to regulations of the crypto industry, such as bitcoin exchanges. “Do you support the right of people to use their bank accounts, credit cards, etc., to move into cryptocurrencies and other forms of money that aren’t as easily tracked by centralized authorities?” Yang replied:
What I would say is that we need to have a uniform set of rules and regulations around cryptocurrency use nationwide because right now we’re stuck with this hodgepodge of state-by-state treatments.
Emphasizing that the current way is “bad for everybody,” including innovators who want to invest in the crypto space, Yang declared: “So, that would be my priority … just clear and transparent rules so that everyone knows where they can head in the future and that we can maintain competitiveness.” He believes that the underlying technology of cryptocurrencies has “very, very high potential and we should be investing in it.”
An ABC News national poll from Jan. 26 shows Yang in fifth place, with 7% support. He was slightly behind Michael Bloomberg, but well behind Joe Biden, Bernie Sanders, and Elizabeth Warren. However, he was ahead of Pete Buttigieg and Amy Klobuchar.
Regulations Cannot Stop Crypto
Weisenthal asked Yang during the interview: “Would you support sort of monetary freedom for people that want to move their money away from fiat currencies, get their money out of the banking system into cryptocurrencies?” He elaborated: “Right now, you have banks restricting payments to these platforms and so forth. And people feel like government regulations are essentially impeding in their desire to do that.” Yang responded:
Right now people who are investing in these currencies are finding a way to, you know, do so and make use of their investments. No, I don’t think that you could impede it with regulations if you tried.
Yang’s Crypto Campaign
Yang has been outspoken about his crypto policies for quite some time. On his campaign website, he noted the rapid growth of cryptocurrencies. However, he explained: “A national framework for regulating these assets has failed to emerge, with several federal agencies claiming conflicting jurisdictions. At the same time, states have come up with a patchwork of varying regulations that make it difficult for the U.S. cryptocurrency markets to compete with those in other jurisdictions, especially China and Europe.”
He pointed out that different government departments treat cryptocurrency differently, such as property, commodities, or securities. He believes that it is time for the federal government to create clear crypto guidelines, asserting:
Cryptocurrency and digital asset markets have developed faster than regulations can keep up. Several states have conflicting and varying regulations on digital asset markets. Uncertainty in what regulatory framework will develop is causing U.S. investment in the area to lag behind the investment of other countries.
With clear guidelines, “businesses and individuals can invest and innovate in the area without fear of a regulatory shift,” Yang wrote, reiterating that “Investment in cryptocurrencies and digital assets has far outpaced our regulatory frameworks in the U.S.”
What do you think about Andrew Yang’s view on cryptocurrency and him becoming the U.S. president? Let us know in the comments section below.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only. It is not an offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or a recommendation, endorsement, or sponsorship of any products, services, or companies. Bitcoin.com does not provide investment, tax, legal, or accounting advice. Neither the company nor the author is responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, goods or services mentioned in this article.
Images courtesy of Shutterstock and Reuters.
Did you know you can buy and sell BCH privately using our noncustodial, peer-to-peer Local Bitcoin Cash trading platform? The local.Bitcoin.com marketplace has thousands of participants from all around the world trading BCH right now. And if you need a bitcoin wallet to securely store your coins, you can download one from us here.
Go to Source
Author: Kevin Helms